|
Issue No. 07 - July 22, 2026 I've been writing this newsletter for seven weeks. I've been posting on LinkedIn almost every day. The content is real. The voice is honest. I think the work is actually good. And for most of these seven weeks I kept asking myself why it wasn't reaching more people. The answer, when I finally looked at it directly, was uncomfortable. The content wasn't the problem. I hadn't built any distribution. I had treated publishing as the finish line. Write the issue, load it in Kit, hit send. Write the post, schedule it, done. I thought the work would find its audience. It doesn't work that way, and I should have known better. I've seen this pattern my entire career. A new process document that nobody uses because nobody was told about it. A strategy deck that was exactly right and went nowhere because the right people never saw it. A tool that got implemented but not adopted because the rollout ended when the training did. In operations, we call this a communication failure. But it's really a distribution failure. The work existed. The audience didn't know. Content and distribution are two separate disciplines, and most people treat them as one. You make the thing, you put the thing somewhere, and you wait. That's publishing. Distribution is something you do actively and deliberately, after the content exists. On LinkedIn, the algorithm decides who sees your posts based on who engages with them first. If the first people to engage aren't your target audience, the algorithm doesn't push the content to your target audience. It just stops. I had been building engagement with the wrong people, not because I'd done anything wrong, but because I hadn't done anything intentional about who I was putting my work in front of. The fix isn't better content. The fix is showing up consistently in the places where your actual audience already is. For me that means finding the creators whose followers are the people I'm trying to reach and being genuinely present in those conversations. Not promoting. Not broadcasting. Just adding something real, week after week, until the right people start noticing who's in the room. It's slower than I'd like. It's also the only thing that actually works. The uncomfortable version of this lesson is that you can be very good at making something and still have almost no one see it. Quality is not a distribution strategy. It's table stakes. Where this lands in the three buckets Immediately actionable: Look at the last thing you published, shared, or launched. Who actually saw it? If the answer is "whoever happened to be paying attention," that's a distribution gap, not a content gap. You don't need to fix the work. You need to fix where it lands. Start thinking about: Where does your actual target audience spend time? Not where you wish they were. Where they are. Now. That's where your distribution strategy has to start, and it's probably not where you've been showing up. Next phase: Building outbound habits that work independently of whether any single piece of content is great. Comments, community presence, consistent engagement in the right conversations. Distribution compounds the same way content does, but only if you do it on purpose. Meghan Brenner is COO at JB Sales and founder of The Operator's Notebook. The Muddy Middle publishes every Tuesday. |
The Muddy Middle is a weekly newsletter for non-technical operators figuring out AI in real time. No tidy conclusions. Just honest notes from the muddy middle.
Issue No. 13 - September 1, 2026 There's a course for everything now. AI for beginners. AI for operators. AI power users. AI mastery. Become an expert in a weekend. Get certified. Get ahead. I've skipped all of them. Deliberately. That's not because I think learning is a waste of time. It's because the framing is wrong. "Mastery" implies a destination. A body of knowledge you work through, complete, and then apply. That model works for a lot of things. It doesn't work for this. The...
Issue No. 12 - August 25, 2026 When I first started using AI seriously, I read everything I could find about how to do it right. Set clear instructions. Tell it who it is. Tell it who you are. Give it context about your tone, your audience, your goals. The more specific, the better. So I did. I built it out carefully. Then I started seeing a different take. Creators I follow, people who work with AI every day, started posting about pulling back on instructions. The argument was...
Issue No. 11 - August 18, 2026 I've been cheating on my AI tools. Not dramatically. Just shopping around. For the last few weeks I've been deliberately splitting my work across different platforms. Strategy questions go to one. Creative work goes to another. Not because I made a formal decision to do it but because I started noticing the outputs felt different depending on where I asked. And once I noticed, I couldn't stop noticing. This isn't a platform review. I'm not going to tell you...